[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: is requiring cl bad?
|
From: |
Xue Fuqiao |
|
Subject: |
Re: is requiring cl bad? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 16 Dec 2012 18:36:17 +0800 |
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 11:26:10 +0100
"Pascal J. Bourguignon" <address@hidden> wrote:
> It should be written as: ™ meaning Trade Mark, meaning "cl is bad" is a
> registered trade mark. No it's not, but it's as famous as if it was.
Thanks for your explanation.
--
Best regards, Xue Fuqiao.
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/XueFuqiao
- is requiring cl bad?, Ivan Kanis, 2012/12/16
- Re: is requiring cl bad?, Xue Fuqiao, 2012/12/16
- Re: is requiring cl bad?, Stefan Monnier, 2012/12/16
- Re: is requiring cl bad?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2012/12/17
- Re: is requiring cl bad?, Tony Day, 2012/12/17
- Re: is requiring cl bad?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2012/12/19
- Re: is requiring cl bad?, Ivan Kanis, 2012/12/20
- Re: is requiring cl bad?, Helmut Eller, 2012/12/20
- Re: is requiring cl bad?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2012/12/21
- Re: is requiring cl bad?, Helmut Eller, 2012/12/21
Re: is requiring cl bad?, Ivan Kanis, 2012/12/17