[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ELPA security
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: ELPA security |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:48:44 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.90 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> "Ted" == Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:
Ted> 1. add DVCS support to package.el, supporting Git and Bazaar, with the
Ted> notion of "pull packages from repo X at tag/commit Y" in addition to the
Ted> current "pull packages from URLs". The VC package has to be involved
Ted> here, instead of writing custom code.
What is the reason for this?
FWIW, I considered and rejected this approach when writing package.el.
My reason was that I wanted packaging not to require any external tools,
so it would be available to all Emacs users. Also, KISS.
Mixing in VC seems to add a lot of potential failure modes.
Tom
- Re: package.el + DVCS for security and convenience, (continued)
Re: ELPA security, Stefan Monnier, 2012/12/22
- Re: ELPA security, Paul Nathan, 2012/12/26
- Re: ELPA security, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/12/31
- Re: ELPA security, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/12/31
- Package signing infrastructure suggestion (was Re: ELPA security), Nic Ferrier, 2012/12/31
- Re: Package signing infrastructure suggestion (was Re: ELPA security), Ted Zlatanov, 2012/12/31
- Re: Package signing infrastructure suggestion (was Re: ELPA security), Xue Fuqiao, 2012/12/31
Re: ELPA security,
Tom Tromey <=
RE: ELPA security, Drew Adams, 2012/12/31
Re: ELPA security, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/12/31
Re: ELPA security, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/12/31