[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ELPA security
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: ELPA security |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Jan 2013 09:35:45 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 11:17:36 +0530 Jambunathan K <address@hidden> wrote:
JK> I have never even thought of verifying my Emacs, ever. If Emacs,
JK> happened to carry a virus or if the rumour-mills go abuzzing about virus
JK> infiltration or if AV packages go bonkers, I may become extra paranoid.
JK> Also, when I am downloading stuff from a distributor I implicitly trust
JK> shouldn't I be doing good. Can I not rely on the distributor to do the
JK> due diligence?
How do you know that distributor.com is who they say they are?
What if there's a break-in at the distributor.com site and malicious
code is brought online?
These are not theoretical situations. They have happened many times.
Ted
- Re: ELPA security, (continued)
- Re: ELPA security, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/01/06
- Re: ELPA security, Paul Nathan, 2013/01/07
- Re: ELPA security, Jambunathan K, 2013/01/07
- Re: ELPA security, Paul Nathan, 2013/01/07
- Re: ELPA security, Jambunathan K, 2013/01/07
- Re: ELPA security, Paul Nathan, 2013/01/07
- Re: ELPA security, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/01/07
- Re: ELPA security, chad, 2013/01/07
- Re: ELPA security, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/01/07
- Re: ELPA security, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/01/07
- Re: ELPA security,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: ELPA security, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/01/07
- Re: ELPA security, Stefan Monnier, 2013/01/07
- Re: ELPA security, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/01/08
- Re: ELPA security, Stefan Monnier, 2013/01/08
- Re: ELPA security, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/01/08
- Re: ELPA security, Stefan Monnier, 2013/01/08
- Re: ELPA security, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/01/08
- Re: ELPA security, Stefan Monnier, 2013/01/08
- Re: ELPA security, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/01/08
- Re: ELPA security, Stefan Monnier, 2013/01/08