[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (0 <= i && i < N) is not "backwards"
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: (0 <= i && i < N) is not "backwards" |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:59:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> For equality comparisons, there's another reason to do "2 == x" rather
> than "x == 2", which is that if you happen to miswrite it as "2 = x", the
> compiler will detect the error.
Fortunately, the emacs source is free from this ugliness.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Re: (0 <= i && i < N) is not "backwards", Jim Meyering, 2013/03/30