[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac
From: |
Ulrich Mueller |
Subject: |
Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Mar 2013 08:53:39 +0100 |
>>>>> On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> So I'm OK with "updating" the indicators, tho I'm not sure what we
> should use instead.
Currently, the indicators coincide with the naming of coding systems,
like utf-8-{unix,dos,mac}. Wouldn't it be confusing to use different
notations? Or are the coding systems to be changed too?
> To replace "Mac", maybe we could use "MacOS9", which is longish but
> hopefully such files are rare nowadays.
You could use "OS9". There are both OS-9 (by Microware) and Mac OS 9,
but they agree on using CR as a line ending.
Ulrich
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, (continued)
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Alan Mackenzie, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/26
Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac,
Ulrich Mueller <=