[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:19:45 +0200 |
> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:02:47 +0000
> From: Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden>
> Cc: Per Starbäck <address@hidden>,
> Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> This is a little confusing to poor old me. ASCII doesn't care about line
> breaks either; only particular use cases care. If you write a script
> (whether bash, sed, ....) on a *nix system and it has CRLF line ends, it
> will fail (with an obscure error message) regardless of whether that
> script is nominally in UTF-8 or ASCII or whatever.
>
> In what sense does Unicode "not care"?
In the sense that the shell script with CR-LF EOLs should not have
failed, if Bash supported Unicode line-breaking features.
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, (continued)
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Alan Mackenzie, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/26
Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Ulrich Mueller, 2013/03/26