[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development
From: |
Michael Welsh Duggan |
Subject: |
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:15:07 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
"John Wiegley" <address@hidden> writes:
> We have often debated the merits of Git vs. Bazaar, and which one the GNU
> project should use for Emacs development. I think now is an appropriate time
> to revisit this decision.
I see these Git versus Bazaar arguments pop up every now and then on
this forum. I must admit my experience with Git has been better than
that with Bazaar, but I have to ask, why isn't Mercurial being
considered? From a license perspective, Mercurial is GPLv2+, while Git
is GPLv2. I found Mercurial's command-line UI much easier to learn and
understand than Git, and I believe the two are fairly comparable in
power.
Or maybe I should just shut up before I start a new round of endless
DCVS discussion...
--
Michael Welsh Duggan
(address@hidden)
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, (continued)
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Richard Stallman, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, John Wiegley, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Bastien, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Richard Stallman, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, chad, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Bastien, 2013/03/28
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development,
Michael Welsh Duggan <=
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Leo Liu, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Giorgos Keramidas, 2013/03/31
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Xue Fuqiao, 2013/03/31
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Giorgos Keramidas, 2013/03/31
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/31
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/27
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, John Wiegley, 2013/03/27
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2013/03/27
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Carsten Dominik, 2013/03/27