[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development
From: |
Stephen Leake |
Subject: |
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 19:16:54 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (windows-nt) |
Stephen Leake <address@hidden> writes:
> Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>>> Well, I don't believe that git will make cross-project merges easier, at
>>>> least not until someone shows me how (and don't just say "submodules",
>>>> please ;-) ).
>>> I'm pretty sure it does make this easier:
>>> http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Subtree-Merging
>>
>> The core of the problem is bidirectional merging.
>
> If I understand what you mean by "bidirectional merging", then monotone
> handles it nicely (http://www.monotone.ca/).
>
> I use monotone for all my projects, and merge back and forth between
> branches all the time.
I suspect the key feature that makes it work is the conflict resolution
tools in monotone;
http://www.monotone.ca/docs/Merge-Conflicts.html#Merge-Conflicts
I worked hard to make that flow nicely, and also to make the Emacs front
end for it flow nicely
(http://stephe-leake.org/emacs/ada-mode/dvc-intro.html)
But there's not a lot of support for monotone, certainly no company is
behind it, so it's probably not a good bet for a large long-term project.
--
-- Stephe
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, (continued)
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Carsten Dominik, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Julien Danjou, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, David Engster, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Julien Danjou, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, David Engster, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen Leake, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development,
Stephen Leake <=
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen Leake, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Andreas Schwab, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, David Engster, 2013/03/28
- Abolishing ChangeLog files (was: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development), Christopher Schmidt, 2013/03/28
- Re: Abolishing ChangeLog files, Thierry Volpiatto, 2013/03/28
- Re: Abolishing ChangeLog files, Richard Stallman, 2013/03/28
- Re: Abolishing ChangeLog files, Aidan Gauland, 2013/03/28
- Re: Abolishing ChangeLog files, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/28
- Re: Abolishing ChangeLog files, Richard Stallman, 2013/03/28