[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: eww
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: eww |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:14:59 +0900 |
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> Why do you want to limit the number of buffers Emacs keeps?
C-x C-b, among others. Of course if the names have leading spaces,
that's not a problem.
> Other browsers don't, I think.
They don't have generic buffer-listing facilities.
> When you go back to a previously visited URL, do you need to check if
> it's outdated?
Yes, if it's expired. Expiration should be parsed from the HTTP
headers and could be cached as a buffer-local.
> Do other browsers?
Good ones do.
> > And it could use `bury-buffer' and rename the previous buffer to a
> > name with something leading with " " when you go to a new page.
>
> I'm confused: don't you name each buffer according to the URL it
> shows? (No, I didn't yet try eww.el.) If so, the names are already
> different.
index.html? Pages identified by long strings of query variables?
- Re: eww, (continued)
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Tom Tromey, 2013/06/17
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Tom Tromey, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Tom Tromey, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Tom Tromey, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Karl Fogel, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Andreas Schwab, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Andreas Schwab, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/19