Re: eww

[Ted Zlatanov]

On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:21:26 -0400 Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote: 

>> Typically (e.g. emacs-w3m integration) TAB and S-TAB move between
>> anchors, but I see no reason `next-error' and `previous-error' can't
>> also be used.  Do you?

SM> They're completely different operations.  `next-error' lets you step
SM> through the destination points of references (which are in
SM> a "compilation" buffer).  The commands you suggest move between
SM> different points of the current buffer with no reference to some
SM> "compilation" buffer.

OK.  Thanks for explaining, I'll keep that distinction in mind.

Ted