[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: eww
From: |
Christopher Schmidt |
Subject: |
Re: eww |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:34:02 +0100 (BST) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> Another question is that
>> `M-x eww RET http://duckduckgo.com/?q=my+user+agent RET'
>> says that the user agent of eww is just "URL/Emacs".
>> Any respectable browser has a longish text for the User-Agent.
>> So its User-Agent would be more informative with something like
>> "eww/5.130008 URL/1.1 Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)"...
>
> I think less is more here.
Why do you think so?
In my opinion, it does not make any practical difference considering the
minimal userbase.
Christopher
- Re: eww, (continued)
- Re: eww, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Stephen Leake, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Xue Fuqiao, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Xue Fuqiao, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Tom Tromey, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Juri Linkov, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww,
Christopher Schmidt <=
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Juri Linkov, 2013/06/20
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/21
- RE: eww, Drew Adams, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Jambunathan K, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Richard Stallman, 2013/06/20
- Re: eww, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/20
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/20
Re: eww, joakim, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Andreas Schwab, 2013/06/18