[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: call for more ert tests
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: call for more ert tests |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:16:08 +0300 |
> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:55:28 +0200
> From: Sebastian Wiesner <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> 2013/6/24 Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>:
> >> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:33:41 +0200
> >> From: Sebastian Wiesner <address@hidden>
> >> Cc: Glenn Morris <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> >>
> >> > IMO, unless we require every new feature to come with a test and a
> >> > report that no regressions were found by running the existing tests,
> >> > we will never get any better testability than what we have now.
> >>
> >> Then this is probably a good policy, isn't it?
> >
> > Which policy?
>
> Well, requiring tests for new features or fixed bugs, and confirmation
> that there are no regressions from the existing tests.
I believe it's good, obviously. The problem is with introducing it
without losing too many contributors.
- call for more ert tests, Glenn Morris, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, Lennart Borgman, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, Sebastian Wiesner, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, Sebastian Wiesner, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: call for more ert tests, Lennart Borgman, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, Óscar Fuentes, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, John Wiegley, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, Leo Liu, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, John Wiegley, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/25
- Re: call for more ert tests, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/25
- Re: call for more ert tests, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/06/25