[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: call for more ert tests
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: call for more ert tests |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:46:11 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> IMO, unless we require every new feature to come with a test and a
> report that no regressions were found by running the existing tests,
> we will never get any better testability than what we have now.
I think that is a tough goal, and also somewhat pessimistic ("unless we
force everybody to be in complete compliance with X, we will never get
any more X"). Maybe we could try to move gradually in this direction
until it naturally becomes the accepted convention? But maybe you are
right and incremental improvement is impossible. I guess we will see...
- Re: call for more ert tests, (continued)
- Re: call for more ert tests, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/25
- Re: call for more ert tests, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/25
- Re: call for more ert tests, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/06/25
- Re: call for more ert tests, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/25
- Re: call for more ert tests, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/25
- Re: call for more ert tests, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/25
- Re: call for more ert tests, Sebastian Wiesner, 2013/06/25
- Re: call for more ert tests, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/25
- Re: call for more ert tests, Julien Danjou, 2013/06/26
- Re: call for more ert tests, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/06/26
Re: call for more ert tests,
Glenn Morris <=
Re: call for more ert tests, RĂ¼diger Sonderfeld, 2013/06/25
Re: call for more ert tests, David Engster, 2013/06/24
Re: call for more ert tests, Daniel Hackney, 2013/06/25
Re: call for more ert tests, Stefan Merten, 2013/06/26