Re: Blink cursor changes, possible W32 breakage.

[Stefan Monnier]

>> >> AFAIK, and I expect that fairly few users use the features that
>> >> require timers (jit-lock-stealth and jit-lock-defer).
>> > I expect most of them do use timer-dependent features all the time.
>> Why?
> You didn't give any reasons for your assertions, either.

No, indeed, but they're not activated unless the user asks for
it explicitly.  Also jit-lock-stealth used to be enabled by default but
was disabled because too many people found it problematic, so only those
people who don't care about high/excessive background CPU usage will
have it enabled.


        Stefan