[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: zlib autoconf question
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: zlib autoconf question |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Aug 2013 05:41:14 +0300 |
> Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 22:28:04 +0200
> From: Ulrich Mueller <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> >>>>> On Sun, 11 Aug 2013, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote:
>
> >> I hope there will be an explicit configure option to enable/disable
> >> zlib support, too?
>
> > Is there a reason to have such an option? If -lz is present, I can't
> > really see why anybody would want Emacs to be built without it...
>
> Emacs may be built one one host where the shared library is present,
> and the resulting binary then distributed to another host where it
> isn't.
The real solution to such problems is to probe for the availability of
the shared library at run time.
- Re: zlib autoconf question, (continued)
Re: zlib autoconf question, Ulrich Mueller, 2013/08/08
Re: zlib autoconf question,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: zlib autoconf question, Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/12
Re: zlib autoconf question, Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/12
Re: zlib autoconf question, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/12
Re: zlib autoconf question, Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/12
Re: zlib autoconf question, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/08/12
Re: zlib autoconf question, Richard Stallman, 2013/08/12
Re: zlib autoconf question, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/08/12
Re: zlib autoconf question, Paul Eggert, 2013/08/12
Re: zlib autoconf question, Dmitry Antipov, 2013/08/12
Re: zlib autoconf question, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas, 2013/08/08