[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is the autogen directory still needed?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Is the autogen directory still needed? |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Oct 2013 05:41:39 +0200 |
> From: Glenn Morris <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 17:26:27 -0400
>
> I'm just saying, that _if_ the only justification we can come up with
> for the existence of the autogen/ directory is that one developer needs
> a few of the files within it from time-to-time for personal use, then
> IMO that's not worth keeping in the repository and updating on a
> (potentially) daily basis.
I didn't express any objections to deleting those files from the
repository, did I?
> Does bzr itself even run under MS-DOS, or do you fetch the sources in
> some other OS, then transfer them across to a DOS environment?
I run my DOS development environment on Windows. The build happens in
a local bzr branch whose parent is the trunk branch that is bound to
savannah.
> But maybe someone else will come up with a good reason why autogen/
> should continue to exist, in which case the above is irrelevant.
Which is why I provided the information about the files that the DOS
build uses.
Re: Is the autogen directory still needed?, Bruce Korb, 2013/10/26