[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Two feature ideas for diffs
From: |
Tom |
Subject: |
Re: Two feature ideas for diffs |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:33:02 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru> writes:
>
> I've been pointed to https://github.com/caldwell/commit-patch in the
> past, but it depends on Perl, and I haven't gotten around to trying it.
The described feature does not seem that complicated if diff editing
supports only simple changes (e.g. no adding/deleting lines, only changing
existing lines in the diff buffer). It should be enough (if one wants to
do extensive modifications then he should go back to the file instead),
so relying on external tools seems an overkill.
- Re: Two feature ideas for diffs, (continued)
- Re: Two feature ideas for diffs, Óscar Fuentes, 2013/11/09
- Re: Two feature ideas for diffs, Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/10
- Git conflict VC state detection, Óscar Fuentes, 2013/11/10
- Re: Git conflict VC state detection, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/11/10
- Re: Git conflict VC state detection, Óscar Fuentes, 2013/11/10
- Re: Git conflict VC state detection, Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/10
- Re: Git conflict VC state detection, Óscar Fuentes, 2013/11/10
- Re: Git conflict VC state detection, Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/10
- Re: Git conflict VC state detection, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/11/11
Re: Two feature ideas for diffs, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/11/07
Re: Two feature ideas for diffs, Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/07
Re: Two feature ideas for diffs, Barry OReilly, 2013/11/07