[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ruby-mide, SMIE and token priority
From: |
Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: |
Re: ruby-mide, SMIE and token priority |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:56:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Bozhidar Batsov <address@hidden> writes:
> I've just noticed that issue myself. Is there any progress on it?
Yes. Try the latest trunk, and check out the examples in
test/indent/ruby.rb. All of them currently work (or else there would be
a comment saying that some don't).
If you have any new broken examples or disagree with some of the choices
in ruby.rb, please tell.
>
> On 7 November 2013 18:02, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>
> >>> Is it at all possible to change the grammar this way?
> >> You'd probably have to use a trick similar to the " @ " used on
> the
> >> space between the method name and the multiple-args.
> > Ah, okay. Sounds not very efficient, performance-wise.
>
>
> Could be. Every trick we add to the tokenizer is a potential
> performance problem, indeed. On the contrary, code in the
> rules-function is generally not performance sensitive.
>
>
> Stefan
>
>
- ruby-mide, SMIE and token priority, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/11/06
- Re: ruby-mide, SMIE and token priority, Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/06
- Re: ruby-mide, SMIE and token priority, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/11/07
- Re: ruby-mide, SMIE and token priority, Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/07
- Re: ruby-mide, SMIE and token priority, Bozhidar Batsov, 2013/11/11
- Re: ruby-mide, SMIE and token priority,
Dmitry Gutov <=
- Re: ruby-mide, SMIE and token priority, Bozhidar Batsov, 2013/11/11
- Re: ruby-mide, SMIE and token priority, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/11/11