[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mark custom function for interactive use only
From: |
Sebastian Wiesner |
Subject: |
Re: Mark custom function for interactive use only |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Nov 2013 11:05:55 +0100 |
2013/11/25 Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>:
>> I presume I'd just patch `byte-compile-form' in bytecomp.el to also
>> look at a corresponding property, e.g. `interactive-use-only`.
>> Anything else?
>
> We should also make byte-compile-interactive-only-functions obsolete and
> default it to nil (i.e. move its contents to symbol properties).
What should the value of the new symbol property be? Just t, for the
same semantics as the variable, or probably a string, which points to
the alternative supposed to be used from Lisp?
- Mark custom function for interactive use only, Sebastian Wiesner, 2013/11/24
- Re: Mark custom function for interactive use only, Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/24
- Re: Mark custom function for interactive use only, Sebastian Wiesner, 2013/11/24
- Re: Mark custom function for interactive use only, Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/24
- Re: Mark custom function for interactive use only,
Sebastian Wiesner <=
- Re: Mark custom function for interactive use only, Sebastian Wiesner, 2013/11/25
- Re: Mark custom function for interactive use only, Sebastian Wiesner, 2013/11/25
- Re: Mark custom function for interactive use only, Bozhidar Batsov, 2013/11/25
- Re: Mark custom function for interactive use only, Sebastian Wiesner, 2013/11/25
- Re: Mark custom function for interactive use only, Bozhidar Batsov, 2013/11/25
- Re: Mark custom function for interactive use only, Sebastian Wiesner, 2013/11/25
- Re: Mark custom function for interactive use only, Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/25
- Re: Mark custom function for interactive use only, Sebastian Wiesner, 2013/11/25
- Re: Mark custom function for interactive use only, Bozhidar Batsov, 2013/11/25
- Re: Mark custom function for interactive use only, Sebastian Wiesner, 2013/11/25