Re: eww

[Bastien]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

> For epa, there are several such entry points, including
> epa-mail-encrypt and epa-insert-keys.  We could do
>
> (define-alternatives crypt-mail-encrypt)
> (define-alternatives crypt-insert-keys)
> with the suitable variable values, but that won't give
> the right result.  The user would be asked to choose an
> alternative for crypt-mail-encrypt, and independently
> to choose an alternative for crypt-insert-keys.
>
> What we really want is for the two commands to be synced
> so that a single choice of alternative applies to both.

I guess for epa-* what is really needed is a better prefix,
not a UI level for the users to chose alternatives--but maybe
that's just because I don't know alternatives to epa-*.

-- 
 Bastien