[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: eww
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: eww |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:04:57 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> What does it need, then?
Nothing at all. This problem with etags exists already with many other
macros and noone cares. That's just life: etags is approximate, it
includes unneeded elements and lacks some elements it should have.
It is still 99% correct for Elisp, so some people use it very happily,
but there's no point uglifying the code just to try and make it work
99.01% instead.
Stefan
- Re: eww, (continued)
- Re: eww, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/15
- Re: eww, Andreas Schwab, 2014/01/15
- Re: eww, Nicolas Richard, 2014/01/15
- Re: eww, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/16
- Re: eww, Andreas Schwab, 2014/01/16
- Re: eww, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/17
- Re: eww,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: eww, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/17
- Re: eww, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/17
- Re: eww, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/18
- Re: eww, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/18
- Re: eww, Francesco Potortì, 2014/01/19
- Re: eww, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/20
- Re: eww, Andreas Schwab, 2014/01/17
- Re: eww, Francesco Potortì, 2014/01/17
- Re: eww, Bastien, 2014/01/17
- Re: eww, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/17