Re: [ruby-mode] dot-alignment support for multi-line method chaining

[Dmitry Gutov]

See http://debbugs.gnu.org/16593

On 22.01.2014 19:28, Bozhidar Batsov wrote:
> Hard to read indentation examples in an email, but it seems to me that:

Yeah, both Gnus and Thunderbird mangle indentation quite a bit for me. 
lists.gnu.org displays it right, though.

> zoo.keep.bar!(
>    {x: y,
>     z: t}
> )
>
> is the only sensible indentation for the third example

It doesn't seem to correspond to the AST, but sure, this looks nicer.

>     By the way, do you think it'd be good if the same variable toggled
>     between
>
>     foo = foobar
>            .baz
>
>     and
>
>     foo = foobar
>        .baz
>
>     ? Or would that be a different variable?
>
>
> Didn't notice this until now. Seems to me the default indent should be
> relative to the `=` (similar to what we do for ops like +, -, etc):

Okay, won't touch this for now, then,