Re: Converted git repository available for review

[David Kastrup]

"Eric S. Raymond" <address@hidden> writes:

> David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>> Sure, but why should any of that end up on gitorious if gitorious
>> already has all the references from the last time you pushed?
>
> The review1 repo has only had one push.

If the sole difference before the next push is a git gc --aggressive, it
still won't have a reason to fetch anything.

If you did a whole history rewrite invalidating all previous references,
things will be different.  Though then there is not all that much
incentive to using the same repository.

-- 
David Kastrup