[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp.

From: Matthew Plant
Subject: Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp.
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:06:18 -0700

I would argue that is still workable, through various hacks. In the cond case if you wanted to specify I raw string literal you would do (("default")), which I think is still illegal.

On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Tassilo Horn <address@hidden> wrote:
Matthew Plant <address@hidden> writes:

Hi Matthew,

> I think that raw string literals would be a really nice thing to add
> to Emacs lisp.

Yes, indeed.

> What if we assume that any string surrounded immediately by
> parenthesis is a raw string literal?  I'm pretty sure every instance
> of ("...") is currently illegal,...

Nope, inside a `cond', ("default") is a short alternative for (t


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]