[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: eww, shr, and mm-text-html-renderer

From: Bill Wohler
Subject: Re: eww, shr, and mm-text-html-renderer
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 21:45:56 -0700

Rüdiger Sonderfeld <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Sunday 27 July 2014 16:34:33 Bill Wohler wrote:
> > On a related note, mm-text-html-renderer doesn't have eww. Why not?
> > 
> > What is the difference between shr and eww?
> `shr' is the HTML renderer used by `eww'.  Kinda like what Gecko is for 
> Firefox or Webkit/Blink for some other browsers.  Maybe the docstring of `mm-
> text-html-renderer' should be changed from "use the built-in Gnus HTML 
> renderer" to "use eww's HTML renderer" or "use GNU Emacs' HTML renderer"?

I like the idea of putting eww in the docstring, since I've heard of
eww, but not shr.

Vielen dank for your reply! The shr renderer does seem to give
slightly better results than w3m, but I was hoping for more inline

Bill Wohler <address@hidden> aka <address@hidden>

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]