[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp.
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp. |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Aug 2014 11:51:01 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
There's nothing particularly difficult about #r"?\" that
isn't shared by, e.g. /* /* */.
C parsing seems to understand that construction, but I am not sure how
it does so. (Want to take a look?)
In any case, There is no such problem with comments in Lisp.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
- Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp., Alan Mackenzie, 2014/08/02
- Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp., David Kastrup, 2014/08/02
- Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp., Alan Mackenzie, 2014/08/02
- Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp.,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp., Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/08/03
- Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp., David Kastrup, 2014/08/03
- Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp., Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/08/03
- Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp., David Kastrup, 2014/08/03
- Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp., Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/08/03
- Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp., Richard Stallman, 2014/08/03
- Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp., David Kastrup, 2014/08/04
- Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp., Richard Stallman, 2014/08/04
- Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp., David Kastrup, 2014/08/05
- Re: Raw string literals in Emacs lisp., David Kastrup, 2014/08/03