[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: if-let and when-let: parallel or sequential

From: Harald Hanche-Olsen
Subject: Re: if-let and when-let: parallel or sequential
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:55:51 +0200 (CEST)

[Bozhidar Batsov <address@hidden> (2014-08-11 17:49:29 UTC)]

> Binding multiple locals in such a form reduces the clarity of the
> code because the  semantics are not that clear anymore - should all
> the forms produce non-nil or should only the first form produce
> non-nil?

This is a valid point, I think. The macros need better nams.
I suggest if-every-let and when-every-let to make it clearer.

There, that's enough bikeshedding for one day.
I'll go back to lurking now.

– Harald

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]