[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libsigsegv?
|
From: |
Dmitry Antipov |
|
Subject: |
Re: libsigsegv? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:20:14 +0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 |
On 09/11/2014 08:04 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
But what is your take on this?
I don't like to discuss nearly the same things twice:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2014-02/msg00063.html
But libsigsegv already did all those tricks, and it stays stable for
quites some time on many platforms (the long and impressive list is in
the library, I suggest to take a look). So why not use all that
knowledge and experience?
"Use" != "link with that library".
Besides, other projects do that (e.g., Gawk). I don't see why we
shouldn't.
Not on my system, BTW:
$ ldd /usr/bin/gawk
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fffe5b54000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x0000003291400000)
libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x0000003291000000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003290c00000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003290800000)
AFAICS Fedora guys uses --with-libsigsegv-prefix=no for gawk since 2009.
Dmitry