[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: libsigsegv?

From: Dmitry Antipov
Subject: Re: libsigsegv?
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:20:14 +0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0

On 09/11/2014 08:04 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

But what is your take on this?

I don't like to discuss nearly the same things twice:

But libsigsegv already did all those tricks, and it stays stable for
quites some time on many platforms (the long and impressive list is in
the library, I suggest to take a look).  So why not use all that
knowledge and experience?

"Use" != "link with that library".

Besides, other projects do that (e.g., Gawk).  I don't see why we

Not on my system, BTW:

$ ldd /usr/bin/gawk
        linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007fffe5b54000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x0000003291400000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x0000003291000000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003290c00000)
        /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003290800000)

AFAICS Fedora guys uses --with-libsigsegv-prefix=no for gawk since 2009.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]