[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why malformed let-form is silently accepted?
|
From: |
David Kastrup |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why malformed let-form is silently accepted? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:52:56 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> (let 1) ==> eval: Wrong type argument: sequencep, 1
>> (let [1 2 3 4]) ==> nil ???
>
> I don't think the behavior matters much when we pass invalid code to
> `eval'. OTOH it's important that we report it when byte-compiling it.
>
>
> Stefan "`eval' is just a crutch needed for bootstrapping"
Chewing is just a crutch when nobody is regurgitating for you.
--
David Kastrup