[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future (was: Guile emacs thread (again))
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future (was: Guile emacs thread (again)) |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Sep 2014 07:43:14 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
It is not acceptable to base a GNU package on LLVM. It is a
non-copylefted competitor to an important GNU package.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
Re: Emacs Lisp's future (was: Guile emacs thread (again)),
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future (was: Guile emacs thread (again)), Kristian Nygaard Jensen, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, James Cloos, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, James Cloos, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Helmut Eller, 2014/09/18
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Thorsten Jolitz, 2014/09/18