[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
|
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
|
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
|
Date: |
Sun, 28 Sep 2014 00:30:55 +0900 |
David Kastrup writes:
> If it would not take much effort, then it should be attempted
> independently.
Oh, it will. But given what I've already got on my schedule, if I get
to it before Emacs does, shame on Emacs.
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/27
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/27
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/27
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/27
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/27
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/09/27
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/27
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/26
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/09/27
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/27
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
Emacs Lisp's future (was: Guile emacs thread (again)), Nic Ferrier, 2014/09/17