[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Referring to revisions in the git future.
From: |
Dima Kogan |
Subject: |
Re: Referring to revisions in the git future. |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Nov 2014 00:09:54 -0700 |
Tassilo Horn <address@hidden> writes:
> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> > 40 hexadecimal digits are pretty unambiguous on their own.
>>
>> Sure, but I had in mind abbreviations as well.
>
> According to the Regex Dictionary at http://www.visca.com/regexdict/
> there is no single English word matching the regex "^[a-f0-9]{7,}$" and
> AFAICS an abberviated Git SHA is 7 chars wide.
Almost:
$ egrep -i '^[a-f]{7,}$' /usr/share/dict/american-english-large
acceded
defaced
effaced