[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Generalizing find-definition
From: |
Stephen Leake |
Subject: |
Re: Generalizing find-definition |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Nov 2014 08:49:14 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.94 (windows-nt) |
Helmut Eller <address@hidden> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 03 2014, Jorgen Schaefer wrote:
>
>>> I have my own hack for this; It requires me to distinguish between
>>> variable and defun names and invoke separate keys; I hope you can
>>> remove that annoyance.
>>
>> I'm not sure how I can remove that annoyance - is that not
>> language-dependent? What kind of functionality would you require there?
>
> One way to solve this is to merge the list of candidates for functions
> and variables. At least that's what we do in SLIME. In elisp-mode
> M-. could combine the candidates of find-function and find-variable.
> Most of the time the merged list would only contain a single candidate.
+1
--
-- Stephe
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, (continued)
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Helmut Eller, 2014/11/20
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/20
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Jorgen Schaefer, 2014/11/20
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/20
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, martin rudalics, 2014/11/21
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/30
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Johan Claesson, 2014/11/23
Re: Generalizing find-definition, Stephen Leake, 2014/11/02