[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: sequence manipulation functions
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: sequence manipulation functions |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Nov 2014 08:25:16 -0800 (PST) |
> I think these should use a "seq-" prefix. This will not only avoid
> naming conflicts, but also helps discover those functions, since you
> can type `(seq- TAB' to see all related functions.
No. Emacs should follow Common Lisp in this regard.
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/Groups/AI/html/cltl/clm/node141.html#SECTION001800000000000000000
And it should follow it not only in terms of names but also in terms
of behavior, as much as is practical. E.g., `some-p' should be `some',
and it should have the Common Lisp `some' behavior.
This might already be more or less the case for `cl-some' etc., in
which case there is no need (and it would be a nuisance) to add a
separate `some-p' etc. with a different behavior.
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Damien Cassou, 2014/11/16
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/20
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Nicolas Petton, 2014/11/21
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/21
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Nicolas Petton, 2014/11/21
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/21
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Nicolas Petton, 2014/11/24
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Nicolas Petton, 2014/11/24
RE: sequence manipulation functions,
Drew Adams <=
Re: sequence manipulation functions, Damien Cassou, 2014/11/05
RE: sequence manipulation functions, Drew Adams, 2014/11/05
Re: sequence manipulation functions, Nicolas Petton, 2014/11/05
Re: sequence manipulation functions, Tom Tromey, 2014/11/05
RE: sequence manipulation functions, Drew Adams, 2014/11/05
RE: sequence manipulation functions, Drew Adams, 2014/11/05
Re: sequence manipulation functions, Richard Stallman, 2014/11/05