[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Generalizing find-definition
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Generalizing find-definition |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:51:02 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) |
> And if find-tag will provide the "multiple occurences" interface on
> its own, there won't be a need for the "next tag" command.
Good point. If we don't have a such a global-map "next-tag" command
anymore, then I guess it's OK to change M-, to do the job of M-*.
Stefan
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, (continued)
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/03
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Stephen Leake, 2014/11/04
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/11/03
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Jorgen Schaefer, 2014/11/04
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Yuri Khan, 2014/11/03
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Jorgen Schaefer, 2014/11/04
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/11/06
- Re: Generalizing find-definition,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Helmut Eller, 2014/11/06
- Multiple next-error sources, Jorgen Schaefer, 2014/11/06
- Re: Multiple next-error sources, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/06
- Re: Multiple next-error sources, Jorgen Schaefer, 2014/11/07
- Re: Multiple next-error sources, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/07
- Re: Multiple next-error sources, Daniel Colascione, 2014/11/07
- Re: Multiple next-error sources, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/07
- Re: Multiple next-error sources, Daniel Colascione, 2014/11/07
- Re: Multiple next-error sources, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/07
- Re: Multiple next-error sources, Daniel Colascione, 2014/11/07