[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: eww, shr, and mm-text-html-renderer
From: |
Bill Wohler |
Subject: |
Re: eww, shr, and mm-text-html-renderer |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:49:17 -0800 |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> wrote:
> Bill Wohler <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On a related note, mm-text-html-renderer doesn't have eww. Why not?
> >
> > What is the difference between shr and eww?
>
> shr is an HTML renderer. eww is a web browser. It's like the
> difference between Gecko and Firefox.
Gotcha.
> eww doesn't make much sense as a `mm-text-html-renderer' value/
>
> > In an MH-Show buffer, which uses the value of mm-text-html-renderer to
> > render HTML, why are all of the images all down at the bottom of the
> > message when using shr? It would be preferable if they were inline.
>
> shr does render images inline, except in tables. Emacs doesn't provide
> the necessary control of the buffer to render stuff like
>
> text text text text text text text
> --------- text text text text text
> | image | text text text text text
> --------- text text text text text
> text text text text text
>
> which would be necessary for doing images inside tables without the
> tables becoming illegible by the presence of the images.
OK, then all of these emails must be tables then. Pity.
Thanks for the explanation.
--
Bill Wohler <address@hidden> aka <address@hidden>
http://www.newt.com/wohler/
GnuPG ID:610BD9AD