[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64 |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:59:18 +0200 |
> From: Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:42:37 +0100
>
> After looking at it, seems that 'conf_post.h' can do the job.
Please do this in ms-w32.h (which is included by conf_post.h).
> But instead of placing the #define on some header that 'conf_post.h'
> includes, I'll like to put it in 'conf_post.h' itself. There are
> similar chunks of code there, so I guess that there is no problem.
The similar things there are for platforms that have n o other place
to put the. Windows has ms-w32.h, so it's better to leave this stuff
there.
Thanks.
- [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/16
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Paul Eggert, 2014/11/16
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/16
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Paul Eggert, 2014/11/16
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Paul Eggert, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Glenn Morris, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/18
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17