[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Network security manager
From: |
Romain Francoise |
Subject: |
Re: Network security manager |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:57:54 +0100 |
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:59:51AM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> I suggest you do it on a personal branch until the point where it
> becomes testable, at which point you can move it to trunk (aka
> "master").
And should personal branches be hosted in the official repository? If
so, shouldn't we agree on a namespace (e.g. `feature/larsi/secmanager')?
Or should developers create separate forked repositories for their
personal branches, ala Github/Gitorious?
- Re: Network security manager, (continued)
- Re: Network security manager, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Glenn Morris, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Daniel Colascione, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Steinar Bang, 2014/11/22
Re: Network security manager,
Romain Francoise <=
- Re: Network security manager, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/17
- Re: Network security manager, Stephen Leake, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen, 2014/11/18
emacs-dynamic-module in Emacs Git?, Stephen Leake, 2014/11/22
Re: emacs-dynamic-module in Emacs Git?, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/22