[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Network security manager
From: |
Rasmus |
Subject: |
Re: Network security manager |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:57:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4.51 (gnu/linux) |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:
> This is trivial to implement in the NSM, but what should the defaults
> be?
IMO: Yes.
> IMAP, POP3: I think most users would want to be warned here
> SMTP, IRC: I don't think anybody cares
> NNTP: They might care if they're sending a password
Excuse my potential ignorance:
I think I sent a (username, password) tuple to my SMTP server when
sending mails. Why should I not care if it's encrypted? If someone
snatched the password they'd be able to get to my IMAP, no?
In fact, in my setup, offlineimap talks to IMAP server, but Emacs talks
directly sents via the SMPT server.
--
Summon the Mothership!
- Re: Network security manager, (continued)
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/17
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/17
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/17
- Re: Network security manager, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/17
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager,
Rasmus <=
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Achim Gratz, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Tassilo Horn, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Tassilo Horn, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/18