[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Network Security Manager merge time?
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: Network Security Manager merge time? |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:40:55 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:22:05 +0100 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
wrote:
LMI> I think the NSM is basically feature complete (i.e., it does what it's
LMI> supposed to according to our discussions). Bugs probably exist, as in
LMI> all code.
LMI> So perhaps it's time to merge it with trunk? `nsm-security-level' would
LMI> be set to `low', which means that it basically would do nothing.
LMI> But we would get more testing of the basic parts -- that I haven't
LMI> screwed up Emacs too much. And then, after a week or so, we could
LMI> switch it to `medium', which would activate it, and then we'll see what
LMI> people think about the way it works.
Does it deprecate `gnutls-verify-error'? If so, we should note that.
Ted
- Network Security Manager merge time?, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network Security Manager merge time?,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: Network Security Manager merge time?, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network Security Manager merge time?, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network Security Manager merge time?, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network Security Manager merge time?, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network Security Manager merge time?, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network Security Manager merge time?, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network Security Manager merge time?, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network Security Manager merge time?, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network Security Manager merge time?, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/25
- Re: Network Security Manager merge time?, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/25