Re: Obscure error/warning/information message from git pull

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Alexis <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 11:57:15 +1100
> 
> At this point, neither 'foo' nor 'bar' are /the/ 'official' continuation
> of 'experiment'. From a workflow perspective, they have equal authority
> - any linear ordering imposed by when the branches got created is
> irrelevant. Yes, at a later time, it might be decided that the 'bar'
> branch becomes the 'official' continuation of the 'experiment' branch,
> i.e. the structure would become:
> 
>               - C - D ... Z <- foo
>             /   
> ... - A - B - E - F ... <- bar
> 
> But until that time, it makes no sense to speak of either the 'foo'
> branch or 'bar' branch as /the/ continuation of the 'experiment' branch.

They both are.