[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bidirectional text and URLs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Bidirectional text and URLs |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Dec 2014 05:49:01 +0200 |
> From: chad <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:39:15 -0800
> Cc: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>,
> address@hidden,
> address@hidden,
> address@hidden
>
>
> > On 30 Nov 2014, at 07:20, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > I'm sorry, but this is not instrumental: it doesn't specify what
> > "misleading" means. We need a detailed spec for that.
>
> Given things we're already identifying the URL in text, is it
> possible/easy to check for a different directionality of any part
> of a URL text (including the entire url) compared to the text (not
> whitespace) before and after the URL?
Yes, but this would only be a sign of trouble if the rest of buffer
text is strictly left to right. And even then, there are legitimate
URLs that have RTL characters, e.g. in Google queries.
So I don't see how this would help.
> In order to make phishing-style surprises work, the mal-ordered
> text probably wants to have the left-side string "http[s]://" and
> the right-side string "//:[s]ptth", right?
I don't think we can count on that. Villains might surprise us. This
is just one example.
But if someone does the research and comes up with such a conclusion,
then yes, it makes our job easier.
- Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, (continued)
Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, Andreas Schwab, 2014/11/28
- Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, Richard Stallman, 2014/11/29
- Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/29
- Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, Richard Stallman, 2014/11/30
- Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/30
- Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, chad, 2014/11/30
- Re: Bidirectional text and URLs,
Eli Zaretskii <=