Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp

[Daniel Colascione]

On 01/15/2015 07:47 PM, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> Richard Stallman wrote:
>> The situation with Emacs will be the same as it is with GCC now:
>> plug-ins have to be GPL.
>>   
> 
> 
> This illuminates the central question at hand:  if an Emacs plugin is
> GPL, and provides access to internals of GCC, which is also GPL, can
> nonfree software use that Emacs plugin?
> 
> I think that the answer to this question is "no", and that this provides
> a means to export GCC's AST to Emacs without opening the AST to nonfree
> software.

That doesn't address Richard's concern. I can write some elisp to export
the AST to my proprietary compiler.

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature