[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Why is C-d not bound to `delete-forward-char'?
From: |
Karl Fogel |
Subject: |
Why is C-d not bound to `delete-forward-char'? |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:17:20 -0600 |
Does anyone know why C-d is bound to `delete-char' instead of
'delete-forward-char'?
If I run "C-h k C-d", I get the help for `delete-char', which says:
| C-d runs the command delete-char (found in global-map), which is an
| interactive built-in function in `C source code'.
|
| It is bound to C-d.
|
| (delete-char N &optional KILLFLAG)
|
| Delete the following N characters (previous if N is negative).
| Optional second arg KILLFLAG non-nil means kill instead (save in
| kill ring). Interactively, N is the prefix arg, and KILLFLAG is set
| if N was explicitly specified.
|
| The command `delete-forward-char' is preferable for interactive use,
| e.g. because it respects values of `delete-active-region' and
| `overwrite-mode'.
According to that last paragraph, `delete-forward-char' would be preferable for
interactive use, which implies that it should be on C-d instead, no?
Best,
-Karl
- Why is C-d not bound to `delete-forward-char'?,
Karl Fogel <=