[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function liter

From: Daniel Colascione
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 01:57:16 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0

On 01/22/2015 01:52 AM, Oleh wrote:
>> Speaking of things that ship with Emacs: have you tried
>> prettify-symbols-mode?
> No need, I've had it for years with the approach that I describe here:
> http://oremacs.com/2015/01/11/pretty-elisp-regex/

Sure. My point is that existence of prettify-symbols-mode and equivalent
is another argument against the creation of a shorter-than-lambda
function literal syntax.

(By the way: the idea of a mode that hides backslashes in string
literals scares me. I'd much rather just use rx.)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]