[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] for review - Allow expansion of "~" (as opposed to "~user")
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] for review - Allow expansion of "~" (as opposed to "~user") |
|
Date: |
Tue, 03 Mar 2015 20:36:59 +0200 |
> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 10:22:39 -0800
> From: Pete Williamson <address@hidden>
> Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> So to solve my porting problem for NaCl, would it be best if I just did a
> system check for NaCl, and if it is the current system, then clear the
> "init-file-user" string?
If by "clear" you mean make it an empty string, then yes, I think
that's what you should do.
- Re: [PATCH] for review - Allow expansion of "~" (as opposed to "~user"), Michal Nazarewicz, 2015/03/02
- Re: [PATCH] for review - Allow expansion of "~" (as opposed to "~user"), Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/02
- Re: [PATCH] for review - Allow expansion of "~" (as opposed to "~user"), Michal Nazarewicz, 2015/03/02
- Re: [PATCH] for review - Allow expansion of "~" (as opposed to "~user"), Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/03
- Re: [PATCH] for review - Allow expansion of "~" (as opposed to "~user"), Michal Nazarewicz, 2015/03/03
- Re: [PATCH] for review - Allow expansion of "~" (as opposed to "~user"), Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/03
- Re: [PATCH] for review - Allow expansion of "~" (as opposed to "~user"), Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/03
- Re: [PATCH] for review - Allow expansion of "~" (as opposed to "~user"), Pete Williamson, 2015/03/03
- Re: [PATCH] for review - Allow expansion of "~" (as opposed to "~user"),
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [PATCH] for review - Allow expansion of "~" (as opposed to "~user"), Pete Williamson, 2015/03/03
- Re: [PATCH] for review - Allow expansion of "~" (as opposed to "~user"), Michal Nazarewicz, 2015/03/03
- Re: [PATCH] for review - Allow expansion of "~" (as opposed to "~user"), Michal Nazarewicz, 2015/03/03
- Re: [PATCH] for review - Allow expansion of "~" (as opposed to "~user"), Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/04