Re: [Emacs-diffs] master f6b5db6: Add support for generators

[Stefan Monnier]

> It does work, though. It's analogous to (progn), (and), and (or), which
> evolve to nil, nil, and t, respectively. Common Lisp also works fine
> with empty function bodies. We shouldn't make empty functions work
> everywhere except this one context.

Feel free to fix macroexp-parse-body accordingly.  I don't think it's
worth my time, but I won't oppose a patch for it (of course, it still
should correctly handle the case of (defun foo () "toto")).


        Stefan