[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VC mode and git
From: |
Barry Warsaw |
Subject: |
Re: VC mode and git |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Mar 2015 16:29:03 -0400 |
On Mar 28, 2015, at 03:35 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>Hardly. Use of bound branches has always been a minority taste.
I'm fairly certain bound branches sprang from a desire to make it easier for
users coming from centralized vcses (most specifically, svn) to switch to a
dvcs without having to change their basic workflow. That bound branches are
even possible is due to architectural choices in bzr.
Having said that, I never used 'em myself.
Cheers,
-Barry
pgpSlawtoNxyh.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: VC mode and git, (continued)
- Re: VC mode and git, Alexis, 2015/03/26
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/26
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/26
- Re: VC mode and git, Richard Stallman, 2015/03/27
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/27
- Re: VC mode and git, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/03/27
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/27
- Re: VC mode and git, Richard Stallman, 2015/03/28
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/28
- Re: VC mode and git, Richard Stallman, 2015/03/28
- Re: VC mode and git,
Barry Warsaw <=
- Re: VC mode and git, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/03/24
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/24
- Re: VC mode and git, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/03/24
- Re: VC mode and git, chad, 2015/03/24
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/24
- Re: VC mode and git, Jan D., 2015/03/25
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/25
- Re: VC mode and git, Jan D., 2015/03/25
- Re: VC mode and git, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/25
- Re: VC mode and git, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/03/25