Re: [Emacs-diffs] seq-let c856843: New macro seq-let, providing destructuring support to seq.el

[Stefan Monnier]

> Wouldn't that be for a difference usage? If not, can you provide an
> example?

You could use it as in

   (pcase-let (((seq a b) [1 2 3]))
     (message "%s %s" a b))

which could return "1 2", tho that depends how you'd define the (seq
...) pattern, obviously.


        Stefan