Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 05/03/2015 09:54 AM, Helmut Eller wrote:

> I was thinking of adding a new function like
>
>   (next-error-note-buffer BUFFER &optional DONT-SELECT)
>
> that essentially replaces next-error-last-buffer for those packages that
> bother to use it AND to add some degree of backward compatibility by
> recording the buffer returned by next-error-find-buffer.

I'm not sure I understand your proposal. You seem to have ignored the 
description of the "non-ideal choice" number two.